Dams

THE FALL OF UNION ELECTRIC’S LOUIS EGAN

756

757

In this press photo of December 30, 1943, Louis H. Egan is not “having the finest time in the world,” as the 1925 profile was titled. With wife Fannie grasping his left arm and deputy U. S. Marshal Davidson holding his right, the tall, disgraced executive clutches a cigarette with a gloved hand. We tell the story of Egan’s glaring error in management that led to his downfall in Damming the Osage: The Conflicted Story of Lake of the Ozark and Truman Reservoir:

Cutline on the press photo dated 3-5-42 showing Egan with a federal eagle behind him, posed as if to sink his claws into him:  “Louis H. Egan, former president of the Union Electric Company of Missouri entering federal court in St. Louis, Mo., where he was found guilty of violating the Corrupt Practices section of the Utility Act. “

Cutline on the press photo dated 3-5-42 showing Egan with a federal eagle behind him, posed as if to sink his claws into him:
“Louis H. Egan, former president of the Union Electric Company of Missouri entering federal court in St. Louis, Mo., where he was found guilty of violating the Corrupt Practices section of the Utility Act. “

Egan’s downfall began when he foolishly fired a Union Electric vice president named Oscar Funk, who, as the July 29, 1940 Time article put it “knew where the bodies were.” A muckraking St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter named Sam Shelton had suspected the utility had been paying politicians for years. Funk spilled the beans to Shelton who in turn confided the information to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reporter got an explosive series of articles and the SEC got Egan. In the Post Dispatch and in court, it was revealed that Union Electric had been demanding sizable kickbacks from lawyers and contractors. From this slush fund, they bribed newspapermen, paid elected officials, and illegally contributed to political campaigns. Egan and his cronies also enriched themselves. Union Electric sued Egan, VP Frank Boehm, and even whistle-blower Oscar Funk to recover $400,000. Funk sued Union Electric for being unjustifiably fired. Several vice presidents did short sentences for perjury, but Louis Egan was convicted of violation of the Corrupt Practices Section of the Holding Company Act of 1935. Union Electric paid an $80,000 fine. Egan paid $10,000 and was sentenced to two years. His appeals failed and on December 31, 1943, the $68,000-a-year former executive entered the federal penitentiary at St. Petersburg, Florida.

The cut line pasted on the back of the photo of Egan leaving for jail said he was headed for federal prison at Terre Haute. Another source had him released a few months shy of two years later from a penitentiary in Florida. He died in 1950 at his home in Clayton, Missouri at the age of sixty-nine of bronchopneumonia.

The names of Egan and the other felons who managed Union Electric during the building of Bagnell Dam are cast in bronze on this plaque attached to the powerhouse.  It was Egan’s pond, but his role in this enormous undertaking has been forgotten.

The names of Egan and the other felons who managed Union Electric during the building of Bagnell Dam are cast in bronze on this plaque attached to the powerhouse. It was Egan’s pond, but his role in this enormous undertaking has been forgotten.

Some of the laws Louis Egan broke regarding campaign financing by corporations were not in place when he began his career. Recently businesses have again been allowed to contribute to political races. Even the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was repealed in 2005, replaced by a new set of regulations that consumer advocates objected to.

In the text of Egan’s appeal, the court upheld his conviction but noted, “the evidence also tends to show that the whole subject of political expenditure was distasteful to him and that his preference would have been to have nothing to do with such matters.” Nevertheless Egan approved for years the “raising a secret fund for political purposes.”

Sordid as the history of building Bagnell Dam is, we suspect public records reveal only a small percentage of the crimes and skullduggery committed by its creators. When the federal government subsequently took over dam building, they too began to lie and subvert regulation, just like the capitalists. Who regulates the regulators?

1006

UNION ELECTRIC’S LOUIS EGAN “I’M HAVING THE FINEST TIME IN THE WORLD.”

bl158

Three men were essential to the building of Bagnell Dam, which created Lake of the Ozarks: a banker, a lawyer, and the president of a power company. Only one stayed out of federal prison. The head of Union Electric was not that lucky one.

Louis Henry Egan was born in 1881 in Lacrosse, Wisconsin. Egan followed his father’s profession and graduated from Yale with a degree in engineering. The “moose tall” president of Union Electric, as Time magazine described him, was profiled in the January 1925 issue of The American Magazine as a can-do, overly optimistic executive. The subtitle of the puff piece read, “’There isn’t any job you ever heard of that can beat mine,’ says Louis H. Egan one of the leading public utility men in the Middle West – It was this attitude that helped him at the age of thirty-eight, to become president of a big electric light company.” Above all, the article stated, Egan despised complaining slackers who he called “Whimper Whine-ies,” who are always “crying a pond.”

The concrete obstacle in the Osage River that ponded Lake of the Ozarks was one of the last significant privately built dams in the United States. It was a project birthed in the Roaring Twenties when free enterprise had been released from strict government regulation after an era of “trust busters” and reformers like Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Bagnell Dam, as Project No. 459 came to be called, was completed in 1931 just as big government was about to snatch the reins back from hard-charging businessmen who had created both phenomenal wealth and crippling debt and were being blamed for the ensuing Great Depression. Egan, prototypical of these Twenties boomers, had built the St. Louis utility into a profitable part of The North American Company’s holdings.

When equally expansionist Kansas City banker Walter Cravens diverted his Land Bank assets into his speculative dam scheme, he ran afoul of federal law and was forced to sell his overly ambitious, underfinanced project. When his original backer pulled out, Cravens took his project to Wall Street, looking for investors. Many firms passed on the opportunity, but he finally connected with Dillon, Read & Co., an investment-banking company with connections to Stone & Webster, Inc., a New England engineering services company founded in 1889, which specialized in public utility projects, especially hydropower facilities. Together they bought a one-year option to buy Cravens’ valuable permit to impound the Osage. In July, 1929, the license was retroactively transferred to Union Electric ninety days before the Wall Street crash that signaled the start of the Great Depression. Cravens was paid $300,000. He needed a good bit of it for lawyers.

North American Company Annual Report, 1947.  Sometime in the late 1920s this octopus of a holding company acquired control of Union Electric’s stock.  North American, known for its bare-knuckle practices, encouraged the St. Louis utility to build a slush fund from kickbacks and use it to illegally finance politicians and bribe public officials.  This notorious holding company was broken up by the feds in 1946. Many online sources state that Union Electric was divested at that time, but this 1947 report still lists the St. Louis utility as an asset.  The holding company for Union Electric today is Ameren.

North American Company Annual Report, 1947. Sometime in the late 1920s this octopus of a holding company acquired control of Union Electric’s stock. North American, known for its bare-knuckle practices, encouraged the St. Louis utility to build a slush fund from kickbacks and use it to illegally finance politicians and bribe public officials. This notorious holding company was broken up by the feds in 1946. Many online sources state that Union Electric was divested at that time, but this 1947 report still lists the St. Louis utility as an asset. The holding company for Union Electric today is Ameren.

The two new project owners had approached The North American Company, among whose holdings was the St. Louis utility, Union Electric. North American also owned ten percent of Stone & Webster. The construction company’s chairman was on the board of the giant holding company as well. Several years earlier Louis Egan had turned down Cravens who was looking for a market for the electricity Project 459 would eventually produce. When a similar proposal came to UE from The North American Company, Egan jumped on board. Union Electric had had no use for the electricity when first approached, and still didn’t, having just finished a huge coal-fired power plant at Kahokia, Illinois near St. Louis. In the late 1920s sophisticated companies like all these involved with the Bagnell Dam project were aware that financial storm clouds were gathering. This $36 million project promised to be one of the last big deals possible before the looming Wall Street deluge of plummeting stock prices.

Had the deal not been expeditiously done, Bagnell Dam would not have been built. Even the reputable construction company was damaged by the crash. Ten shares of Stone & Webster common stock valued at $1,133.75 in 1929 were only worth $62.50 in 1933.

Had the private power company not built the big dam on the Osage River, decades later, the U.S. Army Corps of engineers would have undoubtedly used this superior dam site instead of building their big Osage River dam at the decidedly inferior Kaysinger Bluff site at Warsaw, Missouri. The Miller County location permitted a much higher dam to be constructed, but the capitalist builders were afraid of the political uproar of flooding Warsaw, a town of more than a thousand at the time. Flooding five hundred people at Linn Creek was an overcome-able public relations problem. The disaster that Truman Reservoir became might not have happened if the dam on the lower Osage known as Bagnell had become a larger federal project.

Bagnell Dam, planned in the Roaring Twenties and barely finished as the Great Depression set in, was one of the final privately financed major water resource developments.

Bagnell Dam, planned in the Roaring Twenties and barely finished as the Great Depression set in, was one of the final privately financed major water resource developments.

NEXT POST: THE FALL OF UNION ELECTRIC’S LOUIS EGAN

DICTATORS AND DAMS: Mobutu Dams the Congo River

Central governments naturally wish to publicize their major public works achievements. This is doubly so if they are repressive and have a reputation for corruption. Such untrusted regimes inevitably have unstable currency. All this, along with the normal cult of personality dictators cultivate, means that the image of dams often appears on their country’s untrustworthy money along with a portrait of the strongman.

Wouldn’t the pharaohs picture a pyramid and Ramses the Whatever on their bills if they had issued paper money?

Mobutu Sese Seko (whose much longer full name means ‘The warrior who knows no defeat because of his endurance and inflexible will and is all powerful, leaving fire in his wake as he goes from conquest to conquest.’) with the help of the United States and Belgium overthrew Patrice Lumumba, elected ruler of the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1960. Mobutu shot Lumumba. In 1971, he renamed the Congo Zaire and shortened his name to Mobuto Sese Seko. Before he fled in 1997 to escape a rebellion that three other African countries supported, he amassed a personal fortune some estimate at fifteen billion dollars US.

When Mobutu fled he probably didn’t take much of his own currency with him. While Zaire money didn’t set world records for hyper-inflation, it did reach 24,000 percent in 1994, before dropping to a few hundred percent. One factor that curbed inflation was the firm that printed this money would no longer extend credit to Mobutu’s government.

When Mobutu fled he probably didn’t take much of his own currency with him. While Zaire money didn’t set world records for hyper-inflation, it did reach 24,000 percent in 1994, before dropping to a few hundred percent. One factor that curbed inflation was the firm that printed this money would no longer extend credit to Mobutu’s government.

One of the big construction projects Mobutu looted was the damming of the Congo River at the world’s largest by volume waterfall, Inga Falls. Inga Falls is an excellent location for dams, but the project lacked economic justification.Two enormously costly hydroelectric dams, Inga 1 (1972) and Inga 2 (1982), were built but have been plagued by shoddy construction, breakdowns, silted reservoirs and a lack of paying customers for their electricity. The thousands of natives displaced by the huge reservoirs have yet to receive their promised compensation.  Inga 1 and 2 have still not recouped their costs, are producing 20% of their expected output, and are a continuing drain on the Congo’s economy.

In spite of these difficulties an even larger hydropower plant is moving forward. The Grand Inga Dam if built would produce twice as much electricity as China’s Three Gorges Dam. Apart from the environmental issues, it carries a cost estimate of eighty billion dollars, which is quite disproportionate for a public works project in a very poor country.

Exactly what Mobutu’s personal rake-off of the Inga dam projects is unknown.  Such projects have huge budgets and present a massive opportunity for bribery and corruption. Sadly it isn’t only dictators that accept payoffs for water resource projects. Politicians and bureaucrats of democracies are tempted as well.  When researching Damming the Osage: The Conflicted Story of Lake of the Ozarks and Truman Reservoir, we found evidence of misdeeds by both the instigator and the builder of Bagnell Dam. Walter Cravens, the banker who started the project, and Louis Egan, president of Union Electric, who actually built the dam, both ended up in federal penitentiaries for financial crimes.

Exactly what Mobutu’s personal rake-off of the Inga dam projects is unknown. Such projects have huge budgets and present a massive opportunity for bribery and corruption. Sadly it isn’t only dictators that accept payoffs for water resource projects. Politicians and bureaucrats of democracies are tempted as well.
When researching Damming the Osage: The Conflicted Story of Lake of the Ozarks and Truman Reservoir, we found evidence of misdeeds by both the instigator and the builder of Bagnell Dam. Walter Cravens, the banker who started the project, and Louis Egan, president of Union Electric, who actually built the dam, both ended up in federal penitentiaries for financial crimes.

about-8

Leland & Crystal Payton ISBN: 978-0-9673925-8-5 304 pages 7.5×10 435 illustrations For more information on Damming the Osage, click here.

LABOR IN VAIN: A Curious 1901 Anti-Dam Children Story

What an unusual fable of the folly of blocking rivers is this little story published in an English periodical called The Prize in August 1901. Its lithographed color cover, printed in Holland, shows Georgie Mays and his sisters, Flossy and Maggie, attempting to improve a brook by shoveling rocks and dirt into it so as to create a lake to better sail their toy boats on. Unfortunately their early education has not included courses in engineering and their dam won’t hold. When kindly Aunt Edith comes over to check on the urchins, Georgie looks up and sighs:

‘Oh, dear, Aunt Edith, I wish the water would stop running for a little while. We want a wall strong enough, and high enough, to keep our boats from drifting away.’

Aunt Edith evidences an early environmental sensibility and informs the young would-be water resource developers:

‘Ah, Georgie,’ was the reply, ‘this water started a long, long way off to come to the sea, and it means to reach it, it will not be stopped, dear; your wall is useless.’

This appeal to the poetry and justice of unfettered nature awakens the lad’s organic conscience.

‘Just for a moment Georgie looked vexed, then he laughed, and said brightly, ‘Yes, of course, it has come from far off—miles and miles, and I will not try any longer to hinder it from getting to the sea, where it is meant to go. It is a brave little stream to keep on running, not letting anything stop it, is it not?’

‘Yes, it is,’ agreed the juvenile would-be dam builders. Their wise and eco-informed Aunt closes with a metaphorical platitude comparing free-flowing rivers to moral obligations.

‘I hope, little folk, you will take a lesson from it, and let nothing stop you from going on in the right way, and doing the things which you ought to do.’

It is a “brave little stream” indeed. This admonition to let the waters flow to the sea would seem to go against the spirit of technological progress of the late Victorian era. Of course at the same time there were conflicted figures like Teddy Roosevelt who simultaneously did much to preserve wilderness while building the Panama Canal. We suspect there is far more children’s fiction of this era, especially written for boys, that involves stalwart lads heroically wresting control of nature for the benefits to humanity and rewards to themselves.

bl090

bl091

LABOUR IN VAIN.

GEORGIE Mays, with his sisters, Flossie and Maggie, were spending a week with their aunt at Farcombe Bay. One of their favourite places for play there was near the sand-banks, close to the little boat-house, and not far from the foot of Potter’s Hill, down which a stream ran into the river on its way to the sea.

The children loved to watch this stream hurrying along, over mounds and stones, and down the steps, under the little wooden bridge, and they wished to sail their boats upon it, but they had been warned that, if they did so, the boats would most likely be carried out to sea; for the river made no pause, but ran along at a steady pace.

Well, after thinking over the matter, a new idea came to Georgie, and he said to his sisters,

‘I know what we must do; before we try to sail our boats here, we must make a dam—a strong wall, you know, to reach across the stream, then they cannot get away.’

‘I see what you mean, Georgie,’ answered Flossie, ‘and we had better make the wall just here,’ and she pointed where the stream was narrow and shallow.

So a few minutes later the three children had their shoes and stockings off, and tucked up their other garments, so as to have their legs quite free, and then they set to work to make a wall; but although they worked hard for quite half an hour, they did not bring the task near its end, for, as I have said, the water made no pause, and as it ran past them, it broke down their barrier almost as quickly as they built it up, and at last Maggie got vexed and she left off working, and went and sat down, then Flossie left off, too, and stood still in the water, and Georgie kept on working, and as they were watching him their auntie came upon the scene.

She guessed at once what Georgie was trying to do, and she smiled when he looked up and said with a sigh—

‘Oh, dear, Aunt Edith, I wish the water would stop running for a little while. We want a wall strong enough, and high enough, to keep our boats from drifting away.’

‘Ah, Georgie,’ was the reply, ‘this water started a long, long way off to come to the sea, and it means to reach it, it will not be stopped, dear; your wall is useless.’

Just for a moment Georgie looked vexed, then he laughed, and said brightly, ‘Yes, of course, it has come from far off—miles and miles, and I will not try any longer to hinder it from getting to the sea, where it is meant to go. It is a brave little stream to keep on running, not letting anything stop it, is it not?’

‘Yes, it is,’ agreed his companions, and Aunt Edith added—

‘I hope, little folk, you will take a lesson from it, and let nothing stop you from going on in the right way, and doing the things which you ought to do.’