Tag: Army Corps of Engineers

BUCKLE UP With a DAM Good Belt Buckle

by  • 

Like Hoover (Boulder) Dam, all dams and reservoirs, even small ones, can generate images that promote purposes beyond their hydrological justifications. Cultural and symbolic meanings, Dr. Arrigo, author of Imaging Hoover Dam, convincingly asserts, can be perceived in advertising, souvenirs, and a variety of artifacts that celebrate the mystique of that particular river-blockage.

We further his thesis with a group of decorated hunks of metal used to support a fellow’s jeans. Most of the iconography of these belt buckles isn’t about flood control or hydropower but perpetuates Americans’ belief in the restorative power of outdoor recreation—increasingly a selling point for dam building. Some reservoirs (lakes) are in fact popular. These unnecessarily decorated useful accoutrements, like much of the other stuff in this post, are not specifically mentioned in his book. Our explanations may not be lifted from his writing either, but we run with his ideas that dam trivia can have hidden meaning.

Hoover Dam is just such an icon. It is often used to embellish products like this Montana Silversmiths Men’s Nevada State Heritage Attitude belt buckle. This firm produces buckles for all fifty states decorated with their best-known symbols. A reference to Hoover Dam and Las Vegas appears in this one with a cowboy and hunter flanking the state seal. Many buckles have been produced featuring Hoover Dam’s iconic flank alone

Though not specifically mentioned in Imaging Hoover Dam, these decorative belt buckles embody his thesis that structures built for economic reasons have cultural significance. Thousands of smaller dams built by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Army Corps of Engineers, although not as commanding as Hoover, are promoted for the outdoor recreation their backed-up waters provide.

Bonny Dam in eastern Colorado still stands but its reservoir was drained following a 2003 Supreme Court ruling that forced Nebraska and Colorado to release river water as mandated by the Republican River Compact. The dam exists but in 2011, after years of appeals, the lake behind it was drained to the chagrin of local fishermen. This buckle graphically illustrates the affection locals had for its recreational opportunity in an arid and monotonous High Plains landscape.

 

Belt buckles with anti-dam iconography are exceptional. This “Free the Snake River” buckle expresses the goal of an active movement to remove four Corps’ dams on the lower Snake River. They were built to allow barges to move more freely and to generate a minuscule amount of hydroelectricity. They block the spawning runs of several species of salmon, including Chinook. Once these fish were a vital economic resource.

In the next to last paragraph of his book, Arrigo muses over the ironic fact ephemeral images of dams may continue to freely “speak” to future generations “long after the dam is gone.” Bonny Dam has been left but its function is “gone.” In his account of dam-removals the author doesn’t dismiss the usefulness of some dams. Images of dams do not always verify their stated purpose. Builder propaganda and product advertising have no obligation to be truthful.

A solution to blocking spawning runs has been to stock reservoirs above dams with hatchery-raised fish. That program created a popular sport fishery in Lake Sakakawea but at a cost—hatchery raised fish have poor reproductive fitness. If they mix with the more genetically diverse wild population, the offspring will do poorly. More than 300 scientific studies verified that hatchery-raised trout are poorly adapted to natural environments.

Dr. Arrigo cautions readers that dam memorabilia can misrepresent reality. This belt buckle celebrating the hatchery solution to the blockage of spawning runs is an example.

This species of salmonids is big but not as gigantic as the monster on this sculptured belt buckle commemorating the popularity of stocking Chinook in the biggest North Dakota impoundment.

Not far from Tuttle Creek Lake (Reservoir) is the doing-OK town of Leonardville, Kansas, population 429. Early on a railroad came through and today it’s connected by highways. Leonardville, unlike ten other nearby small towns, supported the construction of a Corps of Engineers dam. Those other burgs would be flooded, or nearly submerged, by the Tuttle Creek flood control project. Despite strong opposition from the three thousand who would be displaced, the earthen dam was built, and the reservoir began filling in 1962.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Tuttle Creek plate shows valued recreational opportunities the impoundment once offered to residents. They were benefits,recreational opportunities the impoundment once offered to residents. They were benefits, but they came at a high price.

A Kansas farmer mowed an anti-Tuttle-Creek Dam message into his field.

Water-powered mills were frontier necessities. Families gathered to convert their grain to flour and the small ponds behind the low dams were places the kids played. These low-tech mills were fondly remembered and idealized in popular culture. Artists painted them and sheet music like “Down by the Old Mill Stream” memorialized them. In a limited-edition belt buckle, Chapman, Kansas recalled an “Old Mill Dam” inactive since1903.

 

The preceding plate-style buckles evolved from Army belts of the mid-1800s. As is evident, this type of buckle affords a large space for decoration. Embellished with Western motifs, they were sported by movie cowboys and awarded to winners of rodeo events. These heavily sculpted ornaments were once exclusively male attire, having had a military origin. Construction, like building dams, was exclusively masculine.

 

BOOK REVEALS HOOVER DAM FULFILLS CULTURAL AS WELL AS ECONOMIC PURPOSES

by  • 

Imaging Hoover Dam: The Making of a Cultural Icon, by Anthony F. Arrigo, (University of Nevada Press, 2014), stands apart from any study for or against that we’ve seen.

This post is a review of Imaging Hoover Dam we submitted to Amazon, here illustrated with objects from the Payton Dam Collection.

Dr. Arrigo, in his preface, states:

In this book I try to answer the question of how Hoover Dam evolved from a pipe dream of land developers and farmers, to an ambitious civil engineering project in the middle of the Mojave Desert, to the visual and cultural icon that it is today. To do this, in contrast to most scholarship on the dam, I provide a significant shift in focus away from chronicled accounts of how it was built and onto its myriad visual representations. In doing so, I trace how its imagery was deployed through advertising, government propaganda, journalism, and other promotional outlets to shape the public’s perception of the project.

Previous books largely ignore dams’ symbolic and cultural significance. Some are for, some are against.

It has been estimated that there are 50,000 large dams in the world. There is no shortage of titles published on the subject of impounding rivers. These mega structures provide benefits. Supporters claim that by controlling wild streams flooding will be reduced. Many produce hydroelectricity. Stored water can be used to irrigate crops. Some of their reservoirs (most often euphemistically called ‘lakes’) develop recreational attractions.

Economics of these costly construction projects are often left to the computation of their builders, who are usually sanctioned and supported by a nation’s central government. Until recently their good was seen to outweigh the loss of farms and towns to their backed-up waters and the blockage of spawning fish was ignored. Cost-benefit analysis is outrageously manipulated by supporters.

Environmentalists point out the environmental degradation caused by some projects. Their effects on a place are more complex and profound than originally suspected. There is now a bookshelf of anti-dam publications matching works that advocate engineering solutions to water resource management. Not only can dams damage the environment, but they also lose storage capacity due to sedimentation as they age. A dam removal movement is gathering momentum in America. China however is building more and bigger dams.

The vitae of this associate professor of writing, rhetoric and communication at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, doesn’t indicate a long career interest in water resources. Dr. Arrigo reveals in his preface why he wrote the book:

A few years ago I was having a casual conversation with someone about a recent vacation to Nevada and California in which I took a side trip to see Hoover Dam. Little did I know that the seemingly inconsequential exchange—a polite “how was your trip” type of encounter that we have with people all the time—would become the catalyst for several years of research culminating in this book.

The unnamed interlocutor, “not being from the United States,” told him, “You must be proud of that as an American.” In further conversation the professor deduced that Hoover (Boulder) Dam was an object of pride in national identity commensurate with Niagara Falls, Mt. Rushmore, and the Statue of Liberty.

This image is from an N.B.C. press release about a program, “It Couldn’t Be Done,” and shows a group of “imposing accomplishments” among which is Hoover Dam.

“The interesting question to me was why.” Arrigo isn’t unaware of the hydrologic aspects of river management or how reservoirs modify landscape. It’s the way images have shaped public opinion of dams that intrigues him. He lists businesses that associate their products with this colossal river intervention. The dam is used as a backdrop for ads for both construction equipment and family cars.

Absurdly, Coca Cola produced a series of items picturing the dam to celebrate Hoover Dam’s Golden Anniversary.  Souvenir stands have dispensed kitsch trinkets decorated with representations of this giant hunk of concrete. Supportive media readily published stories and photographs supplied by the Bureau of Reclamation, the government agency in charge. Hoover Dam became accepted as a wonder of engineering exemplifying America’s mastery of technology and the environment. Negative information and photos were quashed by the BOR.

From Boulder Dam Book of Comparisons, 1937.

Although the Hoover Dam project itself has been the subject of hundreds of publications, this mass of related visual material has barely been considered. By foregrounding representations of Hoover Dam that were produced before, during, and after its construction, Imaging Hoover Dam shows how this supra-discursive visualizing process was integral to the development of the mythology, indeed the very iconicity of the dam, and how the use of Hoover Dam imagery shifted over time from ensuring its construction, to its celebration as a sublime engineering wonder, to its utter commoditization as a means of selling everything from whiskey, to cars, to vacations, to space pens.

Images of Hoover Dam decorate thousands of souvenirs and gifts like this space pen and money clip.

That mention of “space pens” in connection to Hoover Dam sent us to the computer where a Google search revealed a Fisher pen with the image of the dam. It comes in a box with a graphic of the American moon landing suggesting a connection between two disparate examples of our country’s technological genius. It was a nice addition to the collection of memorabilia of many dams we have made. Throughout his book we found mention, and at times illustrations, of stuff already in our horde. Occasionally, as in the case of the space pen, he mentions stuff we could look for.

The author apparently is not a collector of Hoover Dam memorabilia and has relied on institutional collections such as the Boulder City Museum for objects to study. We’ve written and published several books on Ozark rivers and have used photographs of artifacts in our collection to illustrate them. Impounding the clear, spring fed streams of the Ozark uplift has a long and contentious history. Hoover is the centerpiece of this book, but it also critiques the scheme to alter the waterways of the entire Southwest. We were only vaguely familiar with the details of “making the desert bloom” but the manipulation of public opinion to get public support and censor criticism by the dam-building coalitions are very familiar. The methods are the same. Control of wild rivers was, and is, undertaken with fanaticism. Threats to interfere with that sacred mission are dealt with harshly.

After having three titles on pop culture published by major publishers, we founded Lens & Pen Press and produced a group of books on the Ozarks. Damming the Osage (2012) worked in an account of Leland’s punishing experience as a participant in a lawsuit to stop the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. James Fork of the White Transformation of an Ozark River deals with the way water resource development changes the landscape.

We found out how punishing dam advocates can be. Leland was fired from a position with the University of Missouri Extension for being a plaintiff in a federal lawsuit brought by the Environmental Defense Fund to stop or modify a massive Army Corps of Engineers project on the Osage River in Missouri. In a later post we will tell that tale. The EDF challenged the Corps’ economic calculations and pointed out negative impacts, enlisting the testimony of many kinds of scientists.

Dr. Arrigo repeatedly makes the point that these mega projects are propelled by symbolism and promise to fulfill cultural purposes as well as promising tangible economic benefits. In his first chapter, “Nature, Culture, and Transformation,” the author acknowledges the term “culture” is one of the most complex words in the English language:

The way that I used culture in this book, however, centers on an American tradition of land transformation, one that embodies an ethos of modernity eager to use science and technology to transform or order nature into utilitarian functionality. This perspective frames the Hoover Dam’s construction as a beacon of modernism and the apogee of man’s long struggle against nature, one that spurred a frenzy of dam building in the United States and around the world. It also views Hoover Dam as another in a long line of liturgically motivated endeavors to use technology to re-create or reclaim the Garden of Eden for the profit of humankind, a process I term the “divine right of transformation.”

This mechanism of gaining support for dams isn’t unlike the process Vance Packard describes in his 1957 book, The Hidden Persuaders. His motivational research reveals subliminal messaging is used by advertisers and politicians to manipulate expectations and create desire for products or a favorable opinion of candidates. These subconscious promises are more personal and emotional than the manipulations of image for cultural fulfillment in the case of dams.

This book reveals a body of publicity, advertising, and journalism that influences public opinion. For us, Imaging Hoover Dam has served to illuminate our extensive collection of dam memorabilia and souvenirs. More importantly it reveals the power of these hidden persuaders to facilitate the industry of river improvement. If Professor Arrigo’s insights were better known it might make unwise dams more difficult to authorize, fund, and build.

Media has cooperated with agencies that build dams. Magazines and newspapers uncritically published Bureau of Reclamation and Corps of Engineers press releases and used supplied images.

Invention & Technology in 1970 praised Hoover Dam, reproducing a Fortune 1933 cover of one of the dam’s hydroelectric generators. Echoing the promotional hype of the 1930s, the article said, “the incomparable triumph” was “a symbol for all that was right and wrong with America.” Recently, some journalists have noted the adverse effects of some projects but overall most media is laudatory.